{"id":5598,"date":"2026-03-02T09:54:19","date_gmt":"2026-03-02T08:54:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/?p=5598"},"modified":"2026-02-18T22:37:21","modified_gmt":"2026-02-18T21:37:21","slug":"with-local-and-national-subsidies-declining-is-europe-a-panacea-for-culture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/with-local-and-national-subsidies-declining-is-europe-a-panacea-for-culture\/","title":{"rendered":"With Local and National Subsidies Declining, Is Europe a Panacea for Culture?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"is-style-chapo\"><strong>As public support tightens in France, an increasing number of cultural organizations are turning to European funding programs. What are the eligibility conditions for these funds? What human and strategic resources do they require? In a context of intensified competition, are smaller organizations disadvantaged compared to larger institutions better equipped to respond to these calls for projects? An analysis with several European project experts.<br\/>    <\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p>The decline in local and national subsidies, now well documented by the Observatoire des Politiques Culturelles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cartocrise-culture.net\/\">Cartocrise<\/a>, affects cultural organizations across the entire country, across all disciplines. The digital creation sector, which has nevertheless gained increased visibility in recent months\u2014particularly given the central role technology plays in our daily lives\u2014is not immune to this trend. In this context, many digital creation organizations have recently announced projects supported by European funds. For example, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.electroni-k.org\/\">Electroni[k]<\/a>, together with five partners (<a href=\"https:\/\/ohme.be\/fr\/\">OHME<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/solarfutures.eu\/members.html#iii\">iii<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/levfestival.com\/26-gijon\/en\/\">LEV<\/a> Festival, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ulb.be\/\">ULB<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.vub.be\/en\">VUB<\/a>), is rolling out <a href=\"https:\/\/solarfutures.eu\/\">Solar Futures<\/a>, a <a href=\"https:\/\/culture.ec.europa.eu\/fr\/creative-europe\/about-the-creative-europe-programme\">Creative Europe<\/a>\u2013funded initiative. The project invites three artists to create three works exploring ecological, digital, and societal futures. In concrete terms, European funding can reach several million euros, but it can also take the form of more modest support of just a few thousand euros.      The <a href=\"https:\/\/chromosphere.eu\/\">Chromosph\u00e8re<\/a> project, a touring full-dome festival organized with co-hosts in Greece (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.adaf.gr\/\">ADAF<\/a>), Poland (<a href=\"https:\/\/en.patchlab.pl\/\">Patch Lab<\/a> Festival), Italy (<a href=\"https:\/\/liveperformersmeeting.net\">LPM<\/a>), Hungary (<a href=\"https:\/\/fonixinfo.hu\">Fonix<\/a>), and Romania (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AsociatiaArtMirror\/\">Art Mirror<\/a>), enabled <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aadn.org\/\">AADN<\/a> to secure approximately \u20ac35,000. \u201cAn amount that made it possible to design a rich event, for both professionals and the public, entirely free of charge,\u201d notes <a href=\"http:\/\/linkedin.com\/in\/cyrielle-tissandier-4b389781\">Cyrielle Tissandier<\/a>, AADN\u2019s production manager. \u201cIt was particularly relevant in view of our goal of democratizing practices.\u201d<br\/>  <\/p>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1202\" height=\"1800\" src=\"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Alterfutura-x-Chromosphere_AADN_PlanetariumVaulxenVelin_Credit-Valentin-Bisschop-1-1202x1800.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-5588\" srcset=\"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Alterfutura-x-Chromosphere_AADN_PlanetariumVaulxenVelin_Credit-Valentin-Bisschop-1-1202x1800.jpg 1202w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Alterfutura-x-Chromosphere_AADN_PlanetariumVaulxenVelin_Credit-Valentin-Bisschop-1-601x900.jpg 601w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Alterfutura-x-Chromosphere_AADN_PlanetariumVaulxenVelin_Credit-Valentin-Bisschop-1-768x1150.jpg 768w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Alterfutura-x-Chromosphere_AADN_PlanetariumVaulxenVelin_Credit-Valentin-Bisschop-1-1026x1536.jpg 1026w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Alterfutura-x-Chromosphere_AADN_PlanetariumVaulxenVelin_Credit-Valentin-Bisschop-1-1368x2048.jpg 1368w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Alterfutura-x-Chromosphere_AADN_PlanetariumVaulxenVelin_Credit-Valentin-Bisschop-1-scaled.jpg 1710w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 740px) 100vw, 740px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Alterfutura x Chromosphere AADN &#8211; Planetarium Vaulx en Velin &#8211; Credit Valentin Bisschop<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<p>These collaborations between European partners are multiplying rapidly. But are European programs now oversubscribed? Looking more closely at the European Commission\u2019s report <a href=\"https:\/\/digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu\/fr\/library\/decade-creative-europe\">A Decade of Creative Europe<\/a>, published in December 2025, the answer clearly points to an overload. In 2021, there were 463 submissions to the Creative Europe Cooperation call, the program that appears to be the most well-known; by 2023, that number had risen to 831. As a direct result, the success rate dropped sharply, from 27% to 17% over the same period. Political deadlock at the national level, which began in 2024 and worsened in 2025, further exacerbated these figures (last year\u2019s success rate was 7%), making access to these funds increasingly conditional.<br\/>Should this discourage applicants? Certainly not, given the diversity of programs\u2014and therefore objectives\u2014and the potential transformative opportunities they offer to cultural actors.<br\/>       <\/p>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-4-3 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Europe Cr\u00e9ative f\u00eate ses 10 ans !\" width=\"640\" height=\"480\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/vSHuf5rq7R8?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>A Variety of Programs<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p>Before examining existing programs in detail, a reminder is in order: culture is not, strictly speaking, a competency of the European Union. \u201cSometimes it\u2019s said that culture entered through the window,\u201d introduces <a href=\"http:\/\/fr.linkedin.com\/in\/pierre-brini-b5813733\">Pierre Brini<\/a>, co-founder of <a href=\"https:\/\/lelaba.eu\/\">LABA<\/a>, an organization specialized in supporting European projects, and associate professor at Universit\u00e9 Lyon 2. In other words, cultural funding is most often channeled through other lenses: regional development, education, or social initiatives. \u201cThis inevitably shapes these programs and their priorities,\u201d he notes.<br\/>While the 2000s saw the emergence of initiatives such as <a href=\"https:\/\/cordis.europa.eu\/article\/id\/5990-kaleidoscope-programme-to-support-european-artistic-and-cultural-activities\/fr\">Kal\u00e9idoscope<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/FR\/legal-content\/summary\/culture-2000-programme.html\">Culture 2000<\/a>, and Culture 2007\u20132013, directly focused on creation (residencies, production, distribution), 2014 marked a turning point with the launch of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.consilium.europa.eu\/fr\/policies\/creative-europe-2021-2027\/\">Creative Europe program<\/a>. With \u20ac2.44 billion allocated for 2021\u20132027 within an overall European budget\u2014excluding the COVID recovery plan\u2014of approximately \u20ac1,074.3 billion (less than 0.23% of the total), the program represents a significant shift. \u201cSymbolically, we removed the word \u2018culture\u2019 from the program title to open up to the notion of creativity, more geared toward the cultural and creative industries,\u201d analyzes Brini.<br\/>Financial support under this program is therefore primarily geared toward market integration, more akin to seed funding than support for creation per se. \u201cIt was a neoliberal turn that structured European policies until 2020,\u201d he continues. Since then, Creative Europe appears to have reincorporated more transversal concerns\u2014ecological, egalitarian, and democratic\u2014without, however, putting artistic creation back at the center of its priorities. Broadly speaking, \u201cpure\u201d creation remains relatively peripheral in European agendas. Other major programs are no exception, each pursuing its own objectives. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu\/fr\">Erasmus+<\/a> focuses on learning mobility and pedagogical innovation. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.horizon-europe.gouv.fr\/\">Horizon Europe<\/a> is concerned with research and innovation.            <em> <\/em>The <a href=\"https:\/\/commission.europa.eu\/funding-tenders\/find-funding\/eu-funding-programmes\/citizens-equality-rights-and-values-programme\/citizens-equality-rights-and-values-programme-overview_fr\">CERV<\/a> program focuses on citizenship issues,\u201d summarizes Brini. Additional programs, such as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.europe-en-france.gouv.fr\/fr\/programmes-europeens-2021-2027\/programmes-interreg-2021-2027-cooperation-territoriale-europeenne-en-france\">Interreg<\/a>, dedicated to cross-border cooperation, also exist. All share one principle, except in exceptional cases: transnational cooperation, a sine qua non for access to these funds.<br\/>  <\/p>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1800\" height=\"1200\" src=\"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe-1-1800x1200.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-5591\" srcset=\"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe-1-1800x1200.jpeg 1800w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe-1-900x600.jpeg 900w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe-1-600x400.jpeg 600w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe-1-768x512.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe-1-1536x1024.jpeg 1536w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe-1.jpeg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 740px) 100vw, 740px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Augustin Jansem &#8211; Relais Culture Europe<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<p>Beyond these major programs, there are also mechanisms less frequently used by project holders. This is the observation made by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/adelater\/\">Aur\u00e9lie Delater<\/a>, founder of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/noisette-creative-factory\/\">Noisette<\/a> and expert in European funding research, who supports organizations such as <a href=\"https:\/\/chroniques.org\/\">Chroniques<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/gluon.be\/fr\/\">GLUON<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/ogrtorino.it\/\">OGR Torino<\/a>. Some cooperation calls, widely recognized, are now saturated, with particularly low success rates. Conversely, other mechanisms remain more confidential. \u201cA less sought-after type of call, because less well known, is <a href=\"https:\/\/ogrtorino.it\/\">cascade funding<\/a>,\u201d she explains. \u201cWhen a large-scale project is approved under a European initiative such as Horizon or Creative Europe, specific funds are often redistributed through residency calls or programs, with envelopes of several thousand euros. They are open both to individuals, such as artists, and to organizations.\u201d <em> <\/em>Cascade funding, however, has its limits: it does not follow a logic of recurrence and has limited visibility. Access requires constant monitoring and an in-depth knowledge of the intricacies of European policies, which most often restricts it to organizations already supported by specialists in grant applications.<br\/>  <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Funding Open to All\u2026<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p>This initial reading, however, deserves some nuance. Each of the programs previously mentioned actually unfolds as a mosaic of calls for projects, calibrated according to different scales, ambitions, and levels of complexity. \u201cThis introduces real granularity, with mechanisms aimed at all types of organizations,\u201d emphasizes <a href=\"http:\/\/linkedin.com\/in\/stesegagu\">St\u00e9phane Segreto-Aguilar,<\/a> director of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.relais-culture-europe.eu\/\">Relais Culture Europe<\/a>, the French office of the Creative Europe program, tasked with a public service mission to support applicants at the national level. \u201cSome calls are relatively simple, like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.relais-culture-europe.eu\/appels-a-projets\/bourse-a-la-mobilite-individuelle---culture-moves-europe\">mobility grants<\/a>: these are applications that can be prepared in a few weeks if a partner is already in place,\u201d he notes. \u201cConversely, other projects, much more structured, mobilize several hundred thousand euros. They require time to build solid partnerships, assess long-term sustainability, and align all stakeholders.\u201d<br\/>For St\u00e9phane Segreto-Aguilar, it is especially important to deconstruct a common misconception: the supposed systematic dominance of large organizations among awardees. \u201cIt\u2019s a myth to think there is a typical profile. What matters are well-constructed projects, led by relevant partnerships and clearly aligned with the objectives of the calls. In cooperation calls, we see both large organizations that fail and small organizations that succeed.\u201d<br\/><br\/>     <\/p>\n\n<p>This is precisely where Relais Culture Europe\u2019s mission comes into play: providing free support to project holders in understanding European stakes and aligning them with local realities. \u201cWe support applicants up until the submission of their proposal; after that, the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) takes over,\u201d he explains. Over the course of a year, from group training to individual guidance, several hundred projects in the cultural and creative industries benefit from this support. \u201cWe connect initiatives, facilitate partner searches, and ultimately help maximize the chances of success for applications.\u201d   <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>\u2026But Accessibility Must Be Nuanced <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p>In practice, this granularity translates into a diversity of profiles among applicants and awardees. Yet further analysis is needed to understand the filtering mechanisms at work. Pierre Brini offers a first key insight: \u201cEuropean funding is primarily project-based. This implies a near absence of operating support.\u201d Concretely, project holders must demonstrate medium-term impacts, generally over two or three years. \u201cOne must either provide evidence of economic impacts or highlight societal, ecological, or other outcomes,\u201d explains the European funding specialist. This approach inevitably leaves behind certain artists engaged in strictly artistic creation, whose work is difficult to reduce to impact indicators. Conversely, \u201cthose working in laboratory, research, or artistic and cultural education formats, and who conceive of the social function of the artist more broadly, find a better fit within European funding,\u201d he observes.<br\/>     <\/p>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1800\" height=\"1200\" src=\"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe1-1-1800x1200.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-5590\" srcset=\"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe1-1-1800x1200.jpeg 1800w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe1-1-900x600.jpeg 900w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe1-1-600x400.jpeg 600w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe1-1-768x512.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe1-1-1536x1024.jpeg 1536w, https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Augustin-Jansem_Relais-Culture-Europe1-1.jpeg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 740px) 100vw, 740px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Augustin Jansem &#8211; Relais Culture Europe<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<p>Moreover, while the Creative Europe offices play a central role in supporting applicants, submitting a European proposal requires substantial work, both before submission and after the project is selected. The preparation phase, often invisible, demands significant time, skills, and financial resources. The organization <a href=\"https:\/\/www.creativefed.eu\/\">Creative FED<\/a>, the European federation for the creative economy, has noted that for each project reviewed under Creative Europe, the cost\u2014including staff time and overhead\u2014can be estimated at around \u20ac25,000 per proposal. Applied to all applications ultimately rejected between 2021 and 2023, this represents, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/posts\/creativefed_creativefed-activity-7407423102139183104-VDP3?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=member_desktop&amp;rcm=ACoAACELw2kB2N66HJ3d3tL72I0bfdvQCyqBm8k\">according to this ICC advocacy organization<\/a>, nearly \u20ac40 million invested without funding as a result. In other words, the time spent on applications carries a real cost\u2014for both the European Union and the organizations themselves, which often struggle to absorb these costs, especially when their cash visibility sometimes covers only a few months.<br\/>What about organizations based in rural or overseas territories, often on the margins of cultural and creative industries (CCI) logic and still underrepresented in these calls for projects? This is precisely one of the findings highlighted in the Culture &amp; Territories <a href=\"https:\/\/www.observatoire-culture.net\/vers-un-livre-blanc-de-la-decentralisation-culturelle\/\">report<\/a>, released in early 2026 by the \u201cProspective &amp; Territories\u201d working group of Relais Culture Europe, which proposes a series of measures for the 2028\u20132034 programming period. In these regions\u2014undergoing industrial transition or with low population density\u2014numerous locally rooted cultural initiatives contribute to creating new balances. Yet, despite their clear relevance, they remain underrepresented or insufficiently recognized in European projects. Among the recommendations, the report calls for \u201ca differentiated approach for the ORs\/OTs,\u201d suggesting, for instance, the creation of specific calls based on lessons learned from the <a href=\"https:\/\/programme-archipel.eu\/?lang=fr\">Archipel<\/a> program.           <\/p>\n\n<p>\u201cThe first step is crucial, and it sidelines part of the cultural world based on efficiency and cross-cutting criteria,\u201d acknowledges Pierre Brini. Once awarded, organizations must also meet the operational demands of European projects. \u201cThere is a lot of data to gather, organize, and document,\u201d shares Cyrielle Tissandier, reflecting on her experience with Chromosph\u00e8re. In this project, coordination was handled by the lead partner, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.adaf.gr\/\">ADAF<\/a>, which had a dedicated position for managing relations with partners and the European Union, as well as for evaluation and reporting issues. \u201cWe held weekly videoconferences, which allowed us to create and consolidate genuine cooperation around a common project, rather than a mere juxtaposition of events. In short, yes, it is demanding, but with the right human resources and proper tools, it works very well,\u201d she emphasizes.<br\/>This workload often relies on specialized profiles, as is the case with <a href=\"http:\/\/linkedin.com\/in\/ilaria-bondavalli-4a559a16b\">Ilaria Bondavalli<\/a>, European project manager for <a href=\"https:\/\/chroniques.org\/\">Chroniques<\/a>. \u201cA person dedicated to European affairs ensures the link between partners, streamlines communication, creates relevant connections, and guarantees the overall coherence of the project,\u201d she explains. These tasks are accompanied by numerous international trips. She adds, \u201cYou can very clearly see the difference when a project is coordinated by these profiles versus when it is entrusted, in addition to their regular duties, to a team member.\u201d       <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What about digital creation? <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p>It is worth recalling that these European calls for projects represent a major opportunity for the digital creation sector, which is currently undergoing an active phase of structuring. The ecosystem has become significantly denser in recent years, and potential partners have multiplied, as Aur\u00e9lie Delater points out: \u201cDigital cultures have developed across Europe. Where previously I struggled to identify contacts, I now have connections everywhere in Europe.\u201d Certain countries appear particularly mature in their approach to European funding, notably Belgium and the Netherlands. Italy is also a favorable ground, with cultural actors long compensating for weak national support through European funding mechanisms. More recently, countries such as Croatia, Hungary, and Slovenia are emerging in these cooperation dynamics.<br\/>   <\/p>\n\n<p>This openness is all the more remarkable because digital technology now crosses all calls for projects in a transversal way. \u201cThe digital transition is truly a Pandora\u2019s box: there are a thousand ways to talk about digital,\u201d analyzes Pierre Brini. \u201cIt is a transversal priority, and its trap lies precisely in being everywhere and nowhere at the same time.\u201d The European Commission uses broad, catch-all terms, leaving their interpretation to the project leaders. This latitude offers genuine freedom of action but also places a strong responsibility on project framing and meaning. \u201cToday, artificial intelligence is mostly invoked or encouraged in calls for projects. It is becoming increasingly difficult to obtain Erasmus+ funding without an action related to AI skills,\u201d Brini notes wryly.<br\/>Digital creation, however, appears more directly in a specific European initiative: <a href=\"https:\/\/starts.eu\/\">S+T+ARTS<\/a>, launched in 2015. \u201cIt is not on the same level as Creative Europe or Horizon Europe, which are full-fledged programs. S+T+ARTS is an initiative led by <a href=\"https:\/\/commission.europa.eu\/about\/departments-and-executive-agencies\/communications-networks-content-and-technology\/what-we-do-communications-networks-content-and-technology_fr\">DG Connect<\/a>, in charge of the European digital agenda,\u201d explains Aur\u00e9lie Delater, who is familiar with these calls. Every year for nearly ten years, financial support has been mobilized, though the total budget has not been made public. \u201cOn average, around fifteen projects have been supported annually, with funding of roughly \u20ac1.5 million per project,\u201d she estimates.<br\/>      <\/p>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"What is S+T+ARTS initiative?\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Dtst9KfeDXY?list=PLEV4JNNrV8Iff2FyrjXES9KL2RPDUH0Ia\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>AgoraEU on the Horizon <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p>A new European roadmap is expected to take shape in the coming months, notably with a view to merging the Europe Creative and CERV programs. This future initiative, provisionally named <a href=\"https:\/\/commission.europa.eu\/publications\/agoraeu_en\">AgoraEU<\/a>, would cover the period 2028\u20132035 and benefit from increased financial allocations. \u201cIt would be a better-funded program, and although the orientations are still under discussion, the proposal overall seems very positive,\u201d emphasizes St\u00e9phane Segreto-Aguilar. This shift reflects a clear political ambition: to make AgoraEU a space of protection and support for those who create freely, in a European context marked by growing democratic tensions. An increase in funding is planned, but questions remain regarding the place and role assigned to culture. \u201cI am concerned about seeing culture become \u2018merely\u2019 a tool, even for a noble cause like democracy,\u201d nuances Aur\u00e9lie Delater. \u201cIt is not up to Europe to define what culture is for. In this vision, culture risks being limited to utilitarian functions and only valued when it serves the interests defined by policy.\u201d Pierre Brini prefers a more nuanced reading, seeing it as an opportunity. \u201cIt can also be a chance to ask cultural actors what culture really is, and how they influence social movements and ongoing social transformations,\u201d he concludes. From this perspective, digital culture actors clearly have much to contribute.<br\/>        <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>3 Expert Tips<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p>\u201cIt is essential to build your strategy from the start and map out your European journey. The first step can be a mobility grant request, then securing Erasmus+ funding, before moving on to a Creative Europe project. Start with small-scale support, then scale up,\u201d advises St\u00e9phane Segreto-Aguilar, Director of Relais Culture Europe.<\/p>\n\n<p>\u201cYou need to train in the methodological challenges and the vocabulary imposed by Brussels. Some are accustomed to it, others are not, as this kind of project engineering remains very specific. In any case, setting up a European project takes time and high demands, but it is also an opportunity to develop project methodology skills that the organization can later reuse in other contexts,\u201d explains Pierre Brini, co-founder of LABA and associate professor at the University of Lyon 2.<\/p>\n\n<p>\u201cCompetition for European projects is fierce and the success rate is often low. It is essential to diversify funding sources to avoid relying solely on European funds,\u201d notes Aur\u00e9lie Delater, expert in European funding research.<br\/><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"is-style-signature\">Adrien Cornelissen<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As public support tightens in France, an increasing number of cultural organizations are turning to European funding programs. What are the eligibility conditions for these funds? What human and strategic resources do they require? In a context of intensified competition, are smaller organizations disadvantaged compared to larger institutions better equipped to respond to these calls for projects? An analysis with several European project experts.    <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":5597,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[43],"class_list":["post-5598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-expert","tag-economy","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5598"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5598\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5600,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5598\/revisions\/5600"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5597"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}