{"id":5331,"date":"2025-01-28T15:14:08","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T14:14:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/a-charter-to-define-conditions-for-hosting-artists-and-artworks\/"},"modified":"2025-12-22T09:30:11","modified_gmt":"2025-12-22T08:30:11","slug":"a-charter-to-define-conditions-for-hosting-artists-and-artworks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/a-charter-to-define-conditions-for-hosting-artists-and-artworks\/","title":{"rendered":"A Charter to Define Conditions for Hosting Artists and Artworks"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"is-style-Chapo is-style-chapo\">In 2024, following discussions within HACNUM, Thierry Fournier and Ga\u00ebtan Gromer drafted a charter of best practices for hosting artworks and artists \u201cin digital environments.\u201d The charter was then presented to a group of digital creation professionals* within HACNUM, whose governing bodies later voted to adopt it. Its purpose? To establish a remuneration scale, detail criteria for financial support, and specify conditions for exhibition and visibility. More than a declarative statement, the charter now commits HACNUM\u2019s members to implementing dignified and respectful working practices and, by extension, helps artists speak more freely about their current working conditions in the cultural sector.    <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"is-style-Chapo\">The issue of artists\u2019 remuneration remains central across all cultural fields. As Thierry Fournier\u2014artist, curator, and co-initiator of the charter\u2014reminds us, \u201c<em>the eternal argument used to avoid paying artists is the visibility offered to their work. While this situation has improved in recent years thanks to actions led by multiple collectives and professional organizations, it is still common in major group exhibitions and certain festivals.<\/em>\u201d This paradox is striking, especially given that culture and the Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs) make up <a href=\"https:\/\/www.diplomatie.gouv.fr\/fr\/politique-etrangere-de-la-france\/diplomatie-culturelle\/les-industries-culturelles-et-creatives-icc-un-enjeu-cle-de-notre-politique\/#:~:text=Les%20ICC%20repr%C3%A9sentent%20en%20France,celui%20de%20l'industrie%20automobile.\">the 4th-largest economic sector in France<\/a>. While festivals, art centers, and museums cannot function without artists\u2019 productions, some statistics remain alarming: according to the latest report from the  <a href=\"https:\/\/cipac.net\/ressources\/enquetes-et-rapports\/le-revenu-des-artistes-auteurs\">Ministry of Culture\u2019s Statistical Observatory<\/a> (2021)*, the median annual income (all combined) of visual artists was only \u20ac9,120 gross (a little over \u20ac600 net per month). Likewise, fewer than 1.8% of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sacem.fr\/\">SACEM <\/a>members earn an income equal to or above the minimum wage, meaning 98.2% of composers and songwriters fall below this threshold (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nouvelobs.com\/rue89\/rue89-rue89-culture\/20150408.RUE8597\/le-droit-d-auteur-ne-fait-vivre-qu-une-infime-minorite-d-artistes.html\">the study<\/a> dates from 2012 but, according to experts, remains valid today). Most artists in France are therefore poorly paid\u2014or not paid at all\u2014aside from a handful of highly visible figures. \u201c<em>It\u2019s time to move beyond this archaic model in which professional artistic practice is reserved for a wealthy elite who can afford to work without compensation, or a handful of committed individuals willing to sacrifice everything<\/em>\u201d says Ga\u00ebtan Gromer, artist, artistic director of Les Ensembles 2.2, and co-initiator of the charter. A genuine risk for the future of artistic creation, underscoring the urgency of establishing a clear framework to ensure decent working conditions. Especially paradoxical is the fact that France already has a legal system that is supposed to protect authors. Why, then, is precarity so widespread among artists?   <\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/hacnum.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/&#xA9;-Oceane-Rohard-1024x768.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-4016\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>\u00a9 Oc\u00e9ane Rohard<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The urgency of a charter to make problems visible<\/h2>\n\n<p>\u201c<em>The legislation already exists, but in reality, it is still barely applied<\/em>,\u201d states Thierry Fournier unequivocally. The goal of this initiative within HACNUM is to raise awareness among professionals involved in digital arts and equip them to address these crucial issues. \u201c<em>Artists, despite being central actors in the system, remain silent far too often. We believe that having a shared, explicit framework will shed light on these issues and encourage artists to assert their rights without fear,<\/em>\u201d he adds.<br\/><br\/>What does this charter contain, concretely? Designed as a practical, clear, and accessible tool, it is built around <a href=\"https:\/\/hacnum.org\/ressource\/charte-hacum-des-bonnes-pratiques-pour-laccueil-doeuvres-et-dartistes\/\">seven specific sections<\/a> intended to regulate and improve artist remuneration while fostering true recognition of their work.   <\/p>\n\n<p>The charter\u2019s first points establish a minimum fee scale\u2014essential for ensuring fairness among artists and protecting the most vulnerable. Following the initiatives of the Solidarity Economy of Art charters (for which Thierry Fournier was one of the co-initiators), the CARFAC-RAAV guidelines in Canada, W.A.G.E. in the U.S., or Paying Artists in the U.K., this project also draws on existing work in France, such as that of the collective La Buse, the ASTRE network framework, the fee charters for playwrights and children\u2019s book illustrators, and the research carried out by the Observatoire Participatif et Partag\u00e9 des Arts Visuels in Pays de la Loire. The remuneration scale clearly distinguishes artistic fees, production costs, and per diem expenses\u2014\u201celements too often merged into a single lump sum (particularly for residencies), which usually penalizes artists\u2019 fees,\u201d explains Fournier. \u201cThis charter aims to clarify these distinctions. It also stands out from earlier documents by proposing reasonable, viable rates designed to avoid social washing.\u201d The goal is to set simple minimums, with few categories and easy-to-remember amounts, making the tool accessible and practical for all stakeholders.  <\/p>\n\n<p>Another central aspect concerns exhibition conditions and inclusivity. \u201cThere are places where artists are well paid, but where the hosting conditions are poor. We also need to integrate rules that reflect an ideal of an egalitarian society\u2014especially since these venues are mostly funded with public money,\u201d observes Gromer. Fournier adds: \u201cBeyond remuneration, the goal is also to ensure fair visibility for artists\u2019 work. This includes involving them fully in developing and validating the communication around their works, in accordance with their moral rights.\u201d The overall objective is to guarantee dignified and respectful working conditions while embedding artistic practices within a framework of fairness and recognition. <\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/hacnum.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/&#xA9;-David-Gallard-1024x683.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-4017\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>\u00a9 David Gallard<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">A work in progress with real ambition<\/h2>\n\n<p>Applying the charter requires gradually integrating its commitments into professional practices. \u201cThe first implementation step within HACNUM will be to stop relaying or partnering with calls for projects that do not comply with the charter,\u201d announces Gromer. Beyond this regulatory role, HACNUM is also taking on a pedagogical one, guiding its members toward better understanding and applying their commitments. \u201cThe goal is not to use stigmatizing communication, but to highlight the commitment of the signatory venues by encouraging them to explicitly endorse the charter,\u201d adds Fournier.<br\/><br\/>This work in progress also allows new issues to be introduced. Among upcoming priorities, a working group will soon be set up to reflect on improving calls for projects. The objective is to simplify processes for applicants\u2014particularly by removing unnecessary or unrealistic requirements\u2014while standardizing certain elements to streamline work for both applicants and organizers. Regarding inclusivity, \u201cthis is a subject we need to deepen in order to integrate more specific aspects into the charter,\u201d notes Gromer. Generative AI\u2014which also raises crucial questions regarding copyright\u2014could become another future area of focus. The evolving framework aims to build a collective and positive dynamic within the cultural sector.<br\/>     <\/p>\n\n<p>In a context where budget cuts threaten the artistic ecosystem, this charter emerges as a crucial tool\u2014especially to ensure that any \u201cbudgetary efforts,\u201d if required, do not fall solely on artists\u2019 shoulders. \u201cHACNUM can become a laboratory for updating outdated remuneration scales and improving the well-being of artists in the cultural sector. We are also considering expanding the project and its signatories to reinitiate dialogue with the ministry,\u201d says Fournier. Recognizing artists requires fair distribution of resources and fair compensation. This charter of best practices is not merely a technical reference\u2014it stands as a genuine manifesto for placing artists back at the heart of creation. This is far from a minor detail.   <br\/><\/p>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group has-lighter-background-color has-background\"><div class=\"wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-left is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-is-layout-fdcfc74e wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/hacnum.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/charte-hacnum-des-bonnes-pratiques-pour-accueil-artistes-et-oeuvres.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Download the charter<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-button is-style-outline is-style-outline--1\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/hacnum.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/charte-hacnum-des-bonnes-pratiques-pour-accueil-artistes-et-oeuvres-version-imprimable.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Download the printable version<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left\"><br\/><em>This charter was designed by Thierry Fournier (artist and curator, La Loupe) and Ga\u00ebtan Gromer (artist and producer, Strasbourg). Its terms were then discussed and refined through exchanges conducted over the course of one year within the network, with: Juliette Bibasse (curator, Brussels), Eli Commins (director, Le Lieu Unique, Nantes), Val\u00e9rie Perrin (director, Espace Multim\u00e9dia Gantner, Bourogne), Emmanuelle Raynaut (artist, Cie AREP, Paris), Adelin Schweitzer (artist, Deletere, Marseille), Cl\u00e9mentine Treu (artistic director, Saint-Ex, Reims), and Mathieu Vabre (artistic director, Biennale Chroniques, Marseille). It subsequently benefited from feedback from the members of HACNUM\u2019s Executive Committee and Board of Directors.  <\/em><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<p class=\"is-style-Signature is-style-signature\"><a href=\"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/author\/adrien\/\">Adrien Cornelissen<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In 2024, following discussions within HACNUM, Thierry Fournier and Ga\u00ebtan Gromer drafted a charter of best practices for hosting artworks [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":5330,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[39,43],"class_list":["post-5331","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-impact","tag-distribution-mediation","tag-economy","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5331","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5331"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5331\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5332,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5331\/revisions\/5332"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5330"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5331"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5331"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hacnumedia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}